Six of the twenty books of Thomas of Cantimpré’s thirteenth-century Liber de natura rerum are devoted to zoology, and two of them contain descriptions of strange sea animals whose names are often hard to make sense of, both etymologically and semantically. Illuminators had to work with textual descriptions lacking essential information, and in many cases the encyplopedist himself made matters worse by focussing on the most bizarre and peculiar traits of animals encountered in his antique and medieval sources. Consequently, some of the illuminators produced images fanciful enough to make it look like they got carried away by their own imagination. However, a detailed comparison between text and image reveals that artists did their best to follow textual descriptions – it is the literal interpretation of their sources that often strikes us as unexpected and perplexing.
Weitere Artikel in diesem Heft:
Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte Hefte
Band 89 (2026)
Band 88 (2025)
Band 87 (2024)
Band 86 (2023)
Band 85 (2022)
Band 84 (2021)
Band 83 (2020)
Band 82 (2019)
Band 81 (2018)
Band 80 (2017)
Band 79 (2016)
Jetzt die Zeitschrift uneingeschränkt lesen
Ähnliche Titel
Sie möchten monatlich über Neuerscheinungen und Veranstaltungen informiert werden?